Greenhouse: Do I Need to Care?

A Google search of the word ‘greenhouse’ yields 31.5 million results. Don’t check them all; 12 or 13 thousand should be enough to convince you the greenhouse effect is both real and a good thing. Greenhouse is what makes Earth the ‘Goldilocks’ planet – not too hot (like Venus) nor too cold (Mars) – just right for us.

We have the atmosphere to thank for that. It prevents all of the Sun’s infra-red heat energy from being lost due to reflection. Think of it like a one-way insulator that traps just enough heat to keep the Earth’s temperature in the green zone for life as we know it.

The biggest greenhouse vector in the atmosphere is water

Read More
John CadoganComment
The full story of crude oil

In the one second it took you to decide to read this far in the sentence, the world consumed 150,000 litres of crude oil. It would just fit in a cube 5.3 metres along each edge. This volume is burnt every second of every day of every year.

If the pundits are correct, global demand will jump 50 per cent in the next two decades. The question of supply – the ability to meet demand – is less clear cut.

Crude oil is measured and priced by an arcane yardstick called the barrel. One barrel is 42 US gallons; approximately 159 litres. Perversely, it is no longer sold by the barrel. The minimum purchase quantity for west Texas crude

Read More
fuelJohn Cadogan Comment
Understanding The Relationship Between Energy & Fuels

In addition to beaming re-runs of I Love Lucy into space, human beings can do something amazing, which no other animal can. We can expend more energy than we derive from our food. The rest of the animal kingdom, from the lowliest earthworm in your compost heap to the king of beasts cruising the Serengeti for wildebeest, must devote less energy to catching dinner than they recover from eating it. Otherwise, they will wither and die.

Not us. Not by a long shot. In the developed world, food is a contrivance, a given. We have bigger things on our minds. We can build cars, litigate, use iPods, launch space shuttles, fly business class, film TV sit-coms and rise to the absolute pinnacle of the food chain because of one thing alone: we are no longer shackled to the live-or-die imperative of energy conservation. (Having opposing thumbs has helped, too.)

So transparent has this luxury become that few of us are aware it even exists. Take the simple process of cooking. More energy is spent heating the food than we ingest from it

Read More
fuelJohn CadoganComment
Could Synthetic Diesel From Coal be Viable?

Arguably, the fuel with some of the most apparent environmental promise is diesel – but not diesel as we know it.

One of the biggest challenges facing many alternative fuels is not their technological development. It is the fact that their mainstream use would require the reinvention of delivery infrastructure required to get the fuel from point of manufacture to the vehicles.

Hydrogen is a prime example. An efficient delivery system for it has get to be contrived, and will require substantial investment if it is. Every service station on Planet Earth will need an extreme makeover … and current engine technology – plus the vehicles that embody it – will be obsolete.

A smoother segue to greener pastures would be to produce fuels compatible with today’s infrastructure and vehicles, using sustainably sourced materials.

It’s happening now. Synthetic diesel is being manufactured using the carbon and hydrogen in ‘biomass’

Read More
fuelJohn CadoganComment
Passenger Cars & Greenhouse Emissions

One of the worst things about the information age is its uncanny knack of giving unprecedented credibility to uninformed opinion. Those who would demonise your car and its perceived contribution as the harbinger of envirogeddon get their airtime, and then some, basically. Whenever the words ‘Kyoto’ and ‘car’ or ‘oil’ coexist in the one enviro-activist’s ill-informed sound bite, the smart money in general news journalism always bets the farm on Kyoto.

A definitive reality check on Greenhouse emissions is embodied in the Federal Government’s National Greenhouse Inventory 2004 (NGI), which is produced by the Department of Environment and Heritage. The report uses the official Kyoto accounting provisions to quantify Australia’s total Greenhouse emission and its predominate sources dating back to 1990. All this can be yours for the

Read More
John Cadogan Comments