I've read your reviews and understand you have been very positive towards the Mazda CX-5 and with good reason. Given the current life cycle and new options in the market (Nov 2016), would you buy a current model CX-5 or are there better options today? The CX-5 ticks all of the boxes for me, I am just concerned about ageing technology being replaced in the proposed new model and affecting resale value significantly. I am considering the GT 2.2L diesel.
CX-5 is an excellent SUV. All models get replaced, usually with better ones, and there is an effect on resale value. Current CX-5 is due for replacement early in 2017. Usually this effect on resale over time is small, unless you trade-in an old one just after the launch of a new one. Frankly, the biggest factors in respect of depreciation are a) time, and b) demand.
Australia is SUV mad, and CX-5 is the top-selling SUV. A relatively exclusive, upmarket CX-5 (like a diesel GT) is likely to hold up reasonably well on the depreciation front. (Depreciation is still a bastard, however - I’m not sure that’s strictly a financially literate term…)
The other thing that affects resale profoundly is a scandal - Ford Focus, Volkswagen and Jeep owners know all about that.
Frankly, Mazda spent so much money on the CX-5 and the SKYACTIV powertrains that I would expect new models of vehicles like Mazda3 and CX-5 to either roll on the same platforms or borrow heavily from that existing architecture in the redesign (it’s the economically rational way to do it) as well as use the same engines and powertrains, or mildly enhanced versions of same. Therefore, in ‘all new’ models I’d expect underlying engineering commonality, new body panels and a new-but-similar styling treatment (so they’d be sexed up but not enough to scare existing customers off). It’ll be an evolution, and a lot of the enhancements will be ‘off the shelf’ fluff - features they can just buy from Bosch, Aisin Seiki or Johnson Controls - whatever. Read also:
I guess what I’m saying is: If I were you I wouldn’t let the effect of this dictate my decision about the right time to buy. Other factors are possibly more relevant to you (age and condition of existing car, expiration of finance, tax depreciation of existing car, general need for replacement, etc.) Getting the vehicle for the right price regardless of model lifecycle timing is also critical.
A lot of people think their new SUV is tantamount to indestructible. Au contraire. Here's how easy it is to cost yourself thousands
How do you tell which SUV will be more economical in the real world - and if you've got the cash for a new one, do you really care?
You're considering a diesel, but you've heard horror stories about DPFs and sky-high replacement cost. Here's what you need to know.
Seven-seat SUVs come in two basic 'flavours': hard and soft. Which one is right for you depends entirely on what you plan to do with it.
What's the most cost-effective and tax-effective way to buy a seven-seat SUV for my business, and how do you set that up efficiently?
Are diesels compatible with short trips, or is this a path to diesel ownership hell? What type of driving is required to keep a diesel healthy?
Two relatively sexy SUVs and one - let's face it - fairly un-sexy people mover: but which is actually best for transporting a large family?
How important is buying a car at the end of a particular month. A great deal is made of end-of-month timing, but does the month itself really matter?
If you don't know your GVM from your GCM and your ATM, or you struggle with tare weight and kerb weight, here's everything you need to know.
The facelifted Outlander is the best 7-seater SUV if you're on a budget, ushering in the company's (ahem) distinctive new 'dynamic shield' styling
Some SUVs are made for the bush, or heavy towing, and some are little more than de-facto family transport. What's best?
People buy SUVs to move people. It's a popular thing to do. But perversely there is an altogether better class of vehicle for moving people. Click here for more.